Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts HCMDX vs RGAGX
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$25.57
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.38
Change-$0.28 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.93B
HCMDX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCMDX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCMDX is a Hold and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. HCMDX (1.68B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: RGAGX (0.65) vs HCMDX (0.00). HCMDX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: HCMDX (11 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: RGAGX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. HCMDX (-9.20). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.87 vs. RGAGX (46.07).
| HCMDX | RGAGX | HCMDX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.77 | 0.30 | 923% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.122 | 5.137 | -119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 307B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.20 | 6.85 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.17 | 52.96 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.87 | 46.07 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.29 | 72.70 | 211% |