Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HCOW vs TMDV
HCOW vs TMDV Comparison
Open Charts HCOW vs TMDV
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Price$23.22
Change+$0.40 (+1.75%)
Volume$187
Net Assets11.62M
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
Price$47.39
Change-$0.54 (-1.13%)
Volume$594
Net Assets4.2M
HCOW vs TMDV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HCOW vs. TMDV commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCOW is a Hold and TMDV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCOW has more net assets: 11.6M vs. TMDV (4.2M). TMDV has a higher annual dividend yield than HCOW: TMDV (2.445) vs HCOW (-5.142). HCOW was incepted earlier than TMDV: HCOW (2 years) vs TMDV (6 years). TMDV (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than HCOW (0.65).
| HCOW | TMDV | HCOW / TMDV | |
| Gain YTD | -5.142 | 2.445 | -210% |
| Net Assets | 11.6M | 4.2M | 276% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.35 | 186% |
| Turnover | N/A | 22.00 | - |
| Yield | 9.84 | 2.77 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HCOW | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HCOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCOW has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCOW jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCOW | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| NOV - HCOW | 77% Closely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| SLB - HCOW | 76% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| MGY - HCOW | 75% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| VNT - HCOW | 75% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| TXT - HCOW | 75% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||
TMDV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMDV has been loosely correlated with GRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMDV jumps, then GRC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMDV | 100% | N/A | ||
| GRC - TMDV | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| SOLV - TMDV | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CBSH - TMDV | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| UBSI - TMDV | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| MKC - TMDV | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||