HCWB
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.01 (+2.27%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
31 days until earnings call
SLDB
Price
$6.58
Change
-$0.12 (-1.79%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

HCWB vs SLDB

Header iconHCWB vs SLDB Comparison
Open Charts HCWB vs SLDBBanner chart's image
HCW Biologics
Price$0.45
Change+$0.01 (+2.27%)
Volume$12.96K
CapitalizationN/A
Solid Biosciences
Price$6.58
Change-$0.12 (-1.79%)
Volume$179.13K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HCWB vs SLDB Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HCWB vs. SLDB commentary
Oct 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCWB is a StrongSell and SLDB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2024
Stock price -- (HCWB: $0.45 vs. SLDB: $6.58)
Brand notoriety: HCWB and SLDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCWB: 63% vs. SLDB: 79%
Market capitalization -- HCWB: $19.83M vs. SLDB: $272.48M
HCWB [@Biotechnology] is valued at $19.83M. SLDB’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $272.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $531.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCWB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLDB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HCWB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLDB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLDB is a better buy in the long-term than HCWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCWB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLDB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCWB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • SLDB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLDB is a better buy in the short-term than HCWB.

Price Growth

HCWB (@Biotechnology) experienced а -11.89% price change this week, while SLDB (@Biotechnology) price change was -6.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCWB is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

SLDB is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+1.46% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLDB($272M) has a higher market cap than HCWB($19.8M). SLDB YTD gains are higher at: 7.166 vs. HCWB (-63.224). HCWB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -37.19M vs. SLDB (-96.68M). SLDB has more cash in the bank: 190M vs. HCWB (1.16M). HCWB has less debt than SLDB: HCWB (10M) vs SLDB (25.3M). HCWB has higher revenues than SLDB: HCWB (3.92M) vs SLDB (0).
HCWBSLDBHCWB / SLDB
Capitalization19.8M272M7%
EBITDA-37.19M-96.68M38%
Gain YTD-63.2247.166-882%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.92M0-
Total Cash1.16M190M1%
Total Debt10M25.3M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLDB: Fundamental Ratings
SLDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCWBSLDB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HCWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVAEX28.700.32
+1.13%
LSV Value Equity Investor
MOJOX14.470.12
+0.84%
Donoghue Forlines Momentum I
EACPX57.770.46
+0.80%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A
SCIIX9.330.03
+0.32%
Virtus SGA International Growth A
JFNIX79.510.23
+0.29%
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences I

HCWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCWB and ATRA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCWB and ATRA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCWB
1D Price
Change %
HCWB100%
+2.39%
ATRA - HCWB
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.81%
ONVO - HCWB
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
TRAW - HCWB
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
SLDB - HCWB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
SEER - HCWB
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
More

SLDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLDB has been loosely correlated with ACLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLDB jumps, then ACLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLDB
1D Price
Change %
SLDB100%
-1.79%
ACLX - SLDB
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
ATHE - SLDB
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.45%
BBIO - SLDB
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
GLUE - SLDB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
VCEL - SLDB
36%
Loosely correlated
+4.86%
More