Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGSX vs RMEBX
HDGSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGSX vs RMEBX
HDGSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGSX (18.4B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGSX: RMEBX (1.04) vs HDGSX (0.86). HDGSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGSX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HDGSX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . HDGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX (9.46) and HDGSX (9.11) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.78 vs. HDGSX (24.24).
| HDGSX | RMEBX | HDGSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.625 | 7.735 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 9.46 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.04 | 34.98 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.24 | 35.78 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.18 | 96.88 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers