HELOF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.05 (-35.71%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
RMETF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

HELOF vs RMETF

Header iconHELOF vs RMETF Comparison
Open Charts HELOF vs RMETFBanner chart's image
WINSHEAR GOLD
Price$0.09
Change-$0.05 (-35.71%)
Volume$11.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Rackla Metals
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.2K
CapitalizationN/A
HELOF vs RMETF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HELOF vs. RMETF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HELOF is a Hold and RMETF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HELOF: $0.09 vs. RMETF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: HELOF and RMETF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HELOF: 111% vs. RMETF: 312%
Market capitalization -- HELOF: $3.34M vs. RMETF: $5.52M
HELOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.34M. RMETF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HELOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMETF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HELOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMETF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HELOF is a better buy in the long-term than RMETF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HELOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMETF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HELOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RMETF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMETF is a better buy in the short-term than HELOF.

Price Growth

HELOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -35.71% price change this week, while RMETF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMETF($5.52M) has a higher market cap than HELOF($3.34M). RMETF YTD gains are higher at: -65.000 vs. HELOF (-76.794). RMETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -236.38K vs. HELOF (-1.15M). RMETF has more cash in the bank: 1.26M vs. HELOF (588K). HELOF (0) and RMETF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HELOFRMETFHELOF / RMETF
Capitalization3.34M5.52M61%
EBITDA-1.15M-236.38K488%
Gain YTD-76.794-65.000118%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash588K1.26M47%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HELOF vs RMETF: Fundamental Ratings
HELOF
RMETF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4284
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HELOF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as RMETF (52). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMETF (100). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

RMETF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as HELOF (99). This means that RMETF’s stock grew similarly to HELOF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as RMETF (48). This means that HELOF’s stock grew similarly to RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

HELOF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMETF (100). This means that HELOF’s stock grew significantly faster than RMETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HELOFRMETF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HELOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLPLX5.98-0.04
-0.66%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus A
MAPBX20.13-0.17
-0.84%
NYLI WMC Value Class B
GVMCX45.49-0.51
-1.11%
Government Street Opportunities
MASKX25.52-0.30
-1.16%
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Instl
RNNEX60.83-6.30
-9.38%
American Funds New Economy R2E

HELOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HELOF has been loosely correlated with KGSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HELOF jumps, then KGSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HELOF
1D Price
Change %
HELOF100%
N/A
KGSSF - HELOF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RMETF - HELOF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KGLDF - HELOF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMTNF - HELOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+21.43%
JUPGF - HELOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMETF has been loosely correlated with HELOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMETF jumps, then HELOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMETF
1D Price
Change %
RMETF100%
-1.41%
HELOF - RMETF
39%
Loosely correlated
-35.71%
KGSSF - RMETF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADYRF - RMETF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCKYF - RMETF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVLGF - RMETF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
More