Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEMAX vs RNWHX
HEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HEMAX vs RNWHX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets A
Price$10.37
Change+$0.08 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.67M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.45
Change+$0.90 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
HEMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. HEMAX (21.7M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than HEMAX: RNWHX (1.04) vs HEMAX (0.13). HEMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HEMAX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HEMAX (2.23) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HEMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMAX: RNWHX (250) vs HEMAX (2500). HEMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. RNWHX (11.19). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 35.11 vs. HEMAX (20.53).
| HEMAX | RNWHX | HEMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.72 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.72 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.840 | 15.036 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 1.04 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 11.19 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.48 | 35.35 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.53 | 35.11 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement