Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEMCX vs RNWBX
HEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HEMCX vs RNWBX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets C
Price$9.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.09M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.55
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
HEMCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. HEMCX (20.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than HEMCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs HEMCX (0.00). HEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HEMCX (15 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HEMCX (3.42) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). HEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMCX: RNWBX (250) vs HEMCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.47 vs. HEMCX (6.45). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.87 vs. HEMCX (7.47).
| HEMCX | RNWBX | HEMCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.67 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 1.67 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.245 | 14.956 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 7.47 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.15 | 37.59 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.47 | 22.87 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.16 | 59.35 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement