Ad is loading...
HEMCX vs RNWFX
HEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts HEMCX vs RNWFX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets C
Price$8.12
Change-$0.05 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.3M
American Funds New World R5
Price$73.92
Change-$0.64 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.72B
HEMCX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMCX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMCX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 58.7B vs. HEMCX (32.3M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than HEMCX: RNWFX (1.17) vs HEMCX (0.00). HEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: HEMCX (14 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). HEMCX (3.42) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). HEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMCX: RNWFX (250) vs HEMCX (2500). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.99 vs. HEMCX (-8.51). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. HEMCX (11.28).
| HEMCX | RNWFX | HEMCX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.62 | 345% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 0.62 | 552% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.370 | -3.495 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 58.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.51 | -4.99 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.90 | 2.55 | -507% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.28 | 33.27 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.55 | 35.08 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...