Ad is loading...
HEMCX vs RNWHX
HEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HEMCX vs RNWHX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets C
Price$9.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.11M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$80.63
Change+$0.21 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
HEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMCX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. HEMCX (31.1M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than HEMCX: RNWHX (1.10) vs HEMCX (0.00). HEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HEMCX (14 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). HEMCX (3.42) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs HEMCX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.58 vs. HEMCX (1.22). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. HEMCX (19.50).
| HEMCX | RNWHX | HEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.72 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 0.72 | 475% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.741 | 6.064 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.1M | 63.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.22 | 3.58 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.65 | 26.47 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 37.79 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers