Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEMCX vs RNWHX
HEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HEMCX vs RNWHX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets C
Price$9.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.09M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.84
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
HEMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. HEMCX (20.1M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than HEMCX: RNWHX (0.99) vs HEMCX (0.00). HEMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HEMCX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HEMCX (3.42) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMCX: RNWHX (250) vs HEMCX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. HEMCX (6.45). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.58 vs. HEMCX (7.47).
| HEMCX | RNWHX | HEMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.72 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.42 | 0.72 | 475% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.245 | 15.549 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | 8.60 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.15 | 40.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.47 | 27.58 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement