Ad is loading...
HEMIX vs RNWAX
HEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts HEMIX vs RNWAX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets I
Price$8.56
Change+$0.45 (+5.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.3M
American Funds New World R1
Price$70.86
Change+$3.68 (+5.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.68B
HEMIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 55.7B vs. HEMIX (32.3M). HEMIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: HEMIX (0.36) vs RNWAX (0.00). HEMIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: HEMIX (14 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). HEMIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). HEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMIX: RNWAX (250) vs HEMIX (2500). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.40 vs. HEMIX (-12.67). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 20.98 vs. HEMIX (10.73).
| HEMIX | RNWAX | HEMIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.66 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.66 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.039 | -8.760 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 55.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | -11.40 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.83 | -6.66 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.73 | 20.98 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.25 | 21.81 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...