Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEMSX vs RNWBX
HEMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HEMSX vs RNWBX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets S
Price$10.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.09M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.13B
HEMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.1B vs. HEMSX (20.1M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than HEMSX: RNWBX (0.13) vs HEMSX (0.02). HEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HEMSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HEMSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). HEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMSX: RNWBX (250) vs HEMSX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.84 vs. HEMSX (13.46). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. HEMSX (11.56).
| HEMSX | RNWBX | HEMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.98 | 1.67 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.319 | 16.479 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1M | 71.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.13 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.46 | 14.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 37.52 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.56 | 24.82 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement