Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEMSX vs RNWBX
HEMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HEMSX vs RNWBX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets S
Price$10.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.67M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
HEMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. HEMSX (21.7M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than HEMSX: RNWBX (0.13) vs HEMSX (0.02). HEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HEMSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HEMSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). HEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMSX: RNWBX (250) vs HEMSX (2500). HEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. RNWBX (10.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. HEMSX (16.19).
| HEMSX | RNWBX | HEMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.98 | 1.67 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.212 | 15.935 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7M | 70.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.13 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.20 | 10.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.36 | 37.23 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | 27.64 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.65 | - |