Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEMSX vs RNWFX
HEMSX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts HEMSX vs RNWFX
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets S
Price$10.62
Change+$0.08 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.67M
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.05
Change+$0.56 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
HEMSX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEMSX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEMSX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. HEMSX (21.7M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than HEMSX: RNWFX (1.04) vs HEMSX (0.02). HEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: HEMSX (8 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). HEMSX (5.98) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). HEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HEMSX: RNWFX (250) vs HEMSX (2500). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. HEMSX (11.20). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.20 vs. HEMSX (16.19).
| HEMSX | RNWFX | HEMSX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.62 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.98 | 0.62 | 965% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.212 | 16.554 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.7M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.20 | 11.83 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.36 | 40.39 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | 33.20 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.65 | - |