Ad is loading...
HERAX vs RNWBX
HERAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HERAX vs RNWBX
Hartford Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$10.69
Change+$0.22 (+2.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.49M
American Funds New World R2
Price$79.46
Change+$1.71 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
HERAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HERAX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HERAX is a Sell and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. HERAX (402M). HERAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HERAX (2.56) vs RNWBX (0.14). HERAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HERAX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HERAX (1.54). HERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HERAX: RNWBX (250) vs HERAX (2000). HERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. RNWBX (2.17). HERAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.69 vs. RNWBX (35.75).
| HERAX | RNWBX | HERAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.67 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.67 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.438 | 5.710 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 402M | 63.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 0.14 | 1,805% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.19 | 2.17 | 423% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.97 | 21.63 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.69 | 35.75 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.05 | 41.98 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...