Ad is loading...
HERCX vs RNWBX
HERCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HERCX vs RNWBX
Hartford Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$10.51
Change+$0.22 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.49M
American Funds New World R2
Price$79.46
Change+$1.71 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
HERCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HERCX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HERCX is a Sell and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. HERCX (402M). HERCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HERCX (1.84) vs RNWBX (0.14). HERCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HERCX (14 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HERCX (2.31) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). HERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HERCX: RNWBX (250) vs HERCX (2000). HERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. RNWBX (2.17). HERCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.05 vs. RNWBX (35.75).
| HERCX | RNWBX | HERCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.67 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.31 | 1.67 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.107 | 5.710 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 402M | 63.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 0.14 | 1,297% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 2.17 | 382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.17 | 21.63 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.05 | 35.75 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.37 | 41.98 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...