Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFAIX vs TNBMX
HFAIX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts HFAIX vs TNBMX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond I
Price$7.83
Change+$0.02 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.57M
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.19B
HFAIX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFAIX vs. TNBMX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFAIX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNBMX has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. HFAIX (618M). TNBMX pays higher dividends than HFAIX: TNBMX (3.41) vs HFAIX (2.32). HFAIX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: HFAIX (14 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). HFAIX (0.72) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). TNBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.50 vs. HFAIX (29.00). HFAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: HFAIX (2500) vs TNBMX (500000). TNBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. HFAIX (3.21). HFAIX return over 5 years is better than : -4.04 vs. TNBMX (-6.49).
| HFAIX | TNBMX | HFAIX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.53 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.53 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.819 | 2.329 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 618M | 7.19B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 3.41 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 3.73 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.15 | 3.24 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.04 | -6.49 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement