Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDCX vs VIMAX
HFDCX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMAX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.30
Change-$0.38 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.33M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$331.52
Change-$7.01 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.12B
HFDCX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMAX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a Buy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. HFDCX (983M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMAX (1.60) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: HFDCX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.20 vs. HFDCX (-2.86). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 78.48 vs. HFDCX (33.33).
| HFDCX | VIMAX | HFDCX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.887 | 3.632 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 983M | 175B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | 10.20 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 32.51 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.33 | 78.48 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement