Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDCX vs VIMAX
HFDCX vs VIMAX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMAX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.29
Change-$0.27 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets957.51M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
Price$335.74
Change-$3.91 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
HFDCX vs VIMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a Buy and VIMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMAX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. HFDCX (958M). VIMAX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMAX (1.52) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMAX: HFDCX (9 years) vs VIMAX (24 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIMAX (0.05). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMAX (16.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMAX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMAX (3000). VIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.60 vs. HFDCX (-3.68). VIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.70 vs. HFDCX (26.48).
| HFDCX | VIMAX | HFDCX / VIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.05 | 3,820% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.051 | 2.778 | -146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 958M | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.68 | 11.60 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.19 | 39.15 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.48 | 69.70 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers