Ad is loading...
HFDCX vs VIMSX
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$15.88
Change-$0.50 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets929.76M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$65.41
Change-$2.07 (-3.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a Hold and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. HFDCX (930M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMSX (1.46) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDCX (8 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.66 vs. HFDCX (-9.20). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 71.88 vs. HFDCX (29.08).
| HFDCX | VIMSX | HFDCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.17 | 1,129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.17 | 1,129% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.101 | -6.314 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 175B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.20 | 1.66 | -554% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.32 | 6.82 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.08 | 71.88 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers