Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFDCX vs VIMSX
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.30
Change-$0.38 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.33M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$73.08
Change-$1.55 (-2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.12B
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMSX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. HFDCX (983M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMSX (1.48) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDCX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. HFDCX (-2.86). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 78.35 vs. HFDCX (33.33).
| HFDCX | VIMSX | HFDCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.887 | 3.612 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 983M | 175B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.86 | 10.18 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 32.45 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.33 | 78.35 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement