Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
HFDCX vs VIMSX
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HFDCX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$20.41
Change+$0.22 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$76.96
Change+$0.75 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HFDCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFDCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Nov 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFDCX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. HFDCX (1.07B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: VIMSX (1.38) vs HFDCX (0.00). HFDCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HFDCX (8 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). HFDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HFDCX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.07 vs. HFDCX (25.14). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.57 vs. HFDCX (31.68).
| HFDCX | VIMSX | HFDCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.287 | 21.408 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 175B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.14 | 31.07 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.99 | 11.19 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.68 | 64.57 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers