Ad is loading...
HFMCX vs TRQZX
HFMCX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HFMCX vs TRQZX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$95.45
Change+$0.85 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.76B
HFMCX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 26.8B vs. HFMCX (4.43B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HFMCX: TRQZX (0.67) vs HFMCX (0.00). HFMCX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HFMCX (27 years) vs TRQZX (5 years). HFMCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). HFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. TRQZX (22.60). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFMCX: TRQZX (0) vs HFMCX (2000). HFMCX (-9.06) and TRQZX (-9.44) have marching annual gain over last year. TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : 11.44 vs. HFMCX (-13.85).
| HFMCX | TRQZX | HFMCX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.61 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.677 | -6.076 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.43B | 26.8B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.06 | -9.44 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.53 | 7.89 | -83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.85 | 11.44 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| URTY | 32.68 | 1.76 | +5.69% |
| ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | |||
| ARKG | 21.73 | 0.91 | +4.37% |
| ARK Genomic Revolution ETF | |||
| SPSM | 40.40 | 0.73 | +1.84% |
| SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Sm Cap ETF | |||
| MSTQ | 32.51 | 0.23 | +0.70% |
| LHA Market State™ Tactical Q ETF | |||
| HNW | 11.79 | 0.08 | +0.68% |
| Pioneer Diversified High Income Fund | |||