Ad is loading...
HFQRX vs HFYCX
HFQRX vs HFYCX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs HFYCX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$5.82
Change-$0.16 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.83B
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$9.79
Change-$0.31 (-3.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
HFQRX vs HFYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. HFYCX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Hold and HFYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.83B vs. HFYCX (1.94B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: HFQRX (7.88) vs HFYCX (1.73). HFQRX was incepted earlier than HFYCX: HFQRX (9 years) vs HFYCX (8 years). HFYCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. HFYCX (112.00). HFYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: HFYCX (2000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. HFYCX (1.86). HFQRX (71.65) and HFYCX (70.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HFQRX | HFYCX | HFQRX / HFYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.86 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.86 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.414 | 1.683 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.83B | 1.94B | 300% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.88 | 1.73 | 456% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 1.86 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.17 | 7.45 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.65 | 70.50 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers