Ad is loading...
HFQRX vs HFYSX
HFQRX vs HFYSX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs HFYSX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.33
Change-$0.12 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.83B
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
Price$10.79
Change-$0.21 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
HFQRX vs HFYSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. HFYSX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Hold and HFYSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.83B vs. HFYSX (2.11B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than HFYSX: HFQRX (7.88) vs HFYSX (2.41). HFQRX was incepted earlier than HFYSX: HFQRX (9 years) vs HFYSX (8 years). HFYSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. HFYSX (112.00). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: HFYSX (0) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.30 vs. HFYSX (10.96). HFYSX return over 5 years is better than : 90.73 vs. HFQRX (85.14).
| HFQRX | HFYSX | HFQRX / HFYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.17 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.17 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.306 | 10.714 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.83B | 2.11B | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.88 | 2.41 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.30 | 10.96 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.29 | 17.64 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.14 | 90.73 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...