HFUS vs HKSHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFUS is a Hold and HKSHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- HKSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
HKSHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.11%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.45% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| HFUS | HKSHF | HFUS / HKSHF | |
| Capitalization | 88.1M | 1.47B | 6% |
| EBITDA | -1.83M | 877M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -60.656 | -4.674 | 1,298% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.62 | - |
| Revenue | 561K | 3.86B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 15.6K | 657M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 4.54M | 16.6B | 0% |
HKSHF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
HFUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HFUS and ACCYY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFUS and ACCYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFUS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACCYY - HFUS | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
| ACRFF - HFUS | 1% Poorly correlated | +4.56% | ||
| MNOIY - HFUS | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNILY - HFUS | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HKSHF - HFUS | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HKSHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HKSHF and SHCO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKSHF and SHCO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKSHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHCO - HKSHF | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
| DLTTF - HKSHF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACRFF - HKSHF | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.56% | ||
| ACCYY - HKSHF | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.03% | ||
| MNOIY - HKSHF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||