Ad is loading...
HFYCX vs TRWTX
HFYCX vs TRWTX Comparison
Open Charts HFYCX vs TRWTX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val C
Price$10.76
Change-$0.22 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
Transamerica International Equity I3
Price$21.87
Change-$0.64 (-2.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.23B
HFYCX vs TRWTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYCX vs. TRWTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYCX is a Hold and TRWTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRWTX has more cash in the bank: 4.23B vs. HFYCX (2.11B). TRWTX pays higher dividends than HFYCX: TRWTX (2.51) vs HFYCX (1.73). HFYCX was incepted earlier than TRWTX: HFYCX (8 years) vs TRWTX (32 years). HFYCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than TRWTX (0.76). HFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRWTX (12.00). TRWTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYCX: TRWTX (0) vs HFYCX (2000). HFYCX (10.30) and TRWTX (10.05) have marching annual gain over last year. TRWTX return over 5 years is better than : 91.75 vs. HFYCX (85.35).
| HFYCX | TRWTX | HFYCX / TRWTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.76 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.76 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.543 | 10.020 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 4.23B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 2.51 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 10.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 18.79 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.35 | 91.75 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...