Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGOCX vs RGABX
HGOCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HGOCX vs RGABX
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$62.63
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$74.31
Change+$0.40 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
HGOCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGOCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGOCX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. HGOCX (6.01B). HGOCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HGOCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HGOCX (23 years) vs RGABX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: RGABX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. RGABX (10.89). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 38.12 vs. HGOCX (-36.04).
| HGOCX | RGABX | HGOCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.181 | 11.879 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.01B | 324B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 10.89 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.07 | 54.39 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.04 | 38.12 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.84 | 67.93 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers