Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGOCX vs RGABX
HGOCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HGOCX vs RGABX
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$61.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.99B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$73.86
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.45B
HGOCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGOCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGOCX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HGOCX (5.99B). HGOCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HGOCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HGOCX (23 years) vs RGABX (23 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: RGABX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. RGABX (7.90). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.22 vs. HGOCX (-37.18).
| HGOCX | RGABX | HGOCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.622 | 11.201 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.99B | 323B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 7.90 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.88 | 53.14 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.18 | 36.22 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.90 | 69.60 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement