HGPI
Price
$3.25
Change
-$0.71 (-17.93%)
Updated
Mar 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.07M
HLDCY
Price
$2.86
Change
+$0.03 (+1.06%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
14.9B
Ad is loading...

HGPI vs HLDCY

Header iconHGPI vs HLDCY Comparison
Open Charts HGPI vs HLDCYBanner chart's image
Horizon Group Properties
Price$3.25
Change-$0.71 (-17.93%)
Volume$998
Capitalization21.07M
Henderson Land Development
Price$2.86
Change+$0.03 (+1.06%)
Volume$75.58K
Capitalization14.9B
HGPI vs HLDCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLDCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGPI vs. HLDCY commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGPI is a Hold and HLDCY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HGPI: $3.25 vs. HLDCY: $2.86)
Brand notoriety: HGPI and HLDCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGPI: 75% vs. HLDCY: 37%
Market capitalization -- HGPI: $21.07M vs. HLDCY: $14.9B
HGPI [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $21.07M. HLDCY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $14.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGPI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLDCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HGPI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLDCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGPI is a better buy in the long-term than HLDCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLDCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HLDCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

HGPI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -17.93% price change this week, while HLDCY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +7.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.31% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLDCY($14.9B) has a higher market cap than HGPI($21.1M). HGPI YTD gains are higher at: 69.271 vs. HLDCY (-3.051).
HGPIHLDCYHGPI / HLDCY
Capitalization21.1M14.9B0%
EBITDAN/A12.4B-
Gain YTD69.271-3.051-2,271%
P/E RatioN/A12.12-
RevenueN/A25.6B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGPI vs HLDCY: Fundamental Ratings
HGPI
HLDCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4918
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLDCY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGPI (85). This means that HLDCY’s stock grew significantly faster than HGPI’s over the last 12 months.

HGPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLDCY (100). This means that HGPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLDCY’s over the last 12 months.

HLDCY's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as HGPI (100). This means that HLDCY’s stock grew similarly to HGPI’s over the last 12 months.

HGPI's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HLDCY (52). This means that HGPI’s stock grew similarly to HLDCY’s over the last 12 months.

HLDCY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as HGPI (49). This means that HLDCY’s stock grew similarly to HGPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLDCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLDCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHH21.830.16
+0.74%
Schwab US REIT ETF™
JCE15.140.09
+0.60%
Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund
FMHI48.540.04
+0.08%
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
EPRF18.07-0.06
-0.31%
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Prfrd ETF
RTAI21.50-0.16
-0.74%
Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF

HGPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGPI and HLDCY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGPI and HLDCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGPI
1D Price
Change %
HGPI100%
N/A
HLDCY - HGPI
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
HNLGF - HGPI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRNNF - HGPI
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLPPY - HGPI
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
DWAHY - HGPI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLDCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLDCY has been loosely correlated with SUHJY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLDCY jumps, then SUHJY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLDCY
1D Price
Change %
HLDCY100%
+1.06%
SUHJY - HLDCY
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
HLPPY - HLDCY
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
LGFRY - HLDCY
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
BEKE - HLDCY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
HYSNY - HLDCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.77%
More