Ad is loading...
HGXAX vs RSLDX
HGXAX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$14.71
Change+$0.32 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.41M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$61.10
Change+$1.05 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.58B
HGXAX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. RSLDX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 64.6B vs. HGXAX (238M). RSLDX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: RSLDX (0.89) vs HGXAX (0.68). HGXAX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXAX (8 years) vs RSLDX (9 years). HGXAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.52 vs. RSLDX (-9.36). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.34 vs. RSLDX (28.22).
| HGXAX | RSLDX | HGXAX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.80 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.80 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.861 | -10.266 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 64.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.52 | -9.36 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.26 | -5.39 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 28.22 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...