Ad is loading...
HGXAX vs SCWFX
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts HGXAX vs SCWFX
Hartford Global Impact A
Price$16.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.76M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$68.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.67B
HGXAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jan 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXAX is a StrongBuy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 76.7B vs. HGXAX (264M). HGXAX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: HGXAX (0.65) vs SCWFX (0.58). HGXAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: HGXAX (8 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. SCWFX (29.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: SCWFX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.15 vs. SCWFX (8.70). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.17 vs. SCWFX (17.70).
| HGXAX | SCWFX | HGXAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.372 | 3.424 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 76.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.58 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.15 | 8.70 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | 2.60 | 432% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.17 | 17.70 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...