Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs SFCWX
HGXCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs SFCWX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$15.48
Change+$0.17 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.89M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$67.73
Change+$0.21 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.85B
HGXCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. SFCWX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. HGXCX (268M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: SFCWX (1.02) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: HGXCX (8 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). HGXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: HGXCX (2000) vs SFCWX (1000000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. SFCWX (-0.02). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.93 vs. SFCWX (26.42).
| HGXCX | SFCWX | HGXCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.65 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.65 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.545 | -1.655 | -214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | -0.02 | -51,069% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.45 | 19.49 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.93 | 26.42 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers