Ad is loading...
HGXCX vs SFCWX
HGXCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs SFCWX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$14.36
Change+$0.12 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.43M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$62.72
Change+$0.58 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.08B
HGXCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 66.1B vs. HGXCX (244M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: SFCWX (1.04) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: HGXCX (8 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). HGXCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). HGXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: HGXCX (2000) vs SFCWX (1000000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.11 vs. SFCWX (-3.64). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.27 vs. SFCWX (26.47).
| HGXCX | SFCWX | HGXCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.65 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.749 | -8.930 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244M | 66.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | -3.64 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.56 | -3.52 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.27 | 26.47 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...