Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXCX vs SFCWX
HGXCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXCX vs SFCWX
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.43
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.58
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.4B
HGXCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXCX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. HGXCX (299M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: SFCWX (0.94) vs HGXCX (0.00). HGXCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: HGXCX (8 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). HGXCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: HGXCX (2000) vs SFCWX (1000000). HGXCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. SFCWX (10.24). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.58 vs. SFCWX (21.81).
| HGXCX | SFCWX | HGXCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.65 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.65 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.365 | 9.778 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 79.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 10.24 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.49 | 33.82 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.58 | 21.81 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement