Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLDX
HGXIX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$17.29
Change-$0.15 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets315.34M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$75.47
Change-$0.54 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.34B
HGXIX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLDX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Buy and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. HGXIX (315M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: HGXIX (0.90) vs RSLDX (0.81). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). HGXIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. RSLDX (7.93). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.03 vs. RSLDX (14.99).
| HGXIX | RSLDX | HGXIX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.394 | 10.874 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.45 | 7.93 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.41 | 30.82 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.03 | 14.99 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement