Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGXIX vs RSLDX
HGXIX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs RSLDX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.64
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.16M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$73.11
Change+$0.42 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
HGXIX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. RSLDX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. HGXIX (291M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: HGXIX (0.89) vs RSLDX (0.81). HGXIX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: HGXIX (8 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). HGXIX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: RSLDX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. RSLDX (3.49). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.51 vs. RSLDX (18.76).
| HGXIX | RSLDX | HGXIX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.80 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.737 | 7.407 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.81 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 3.49 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.08 | 34.33 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 18.76 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers