Ad is loading...
HGXIX vs SMCWX
HGXIX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts HGXIX vs SMCWX
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$15.95
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.59M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$68.24
Change+$0.29 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.12B
HGXIX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGXIX vs. SMCWX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGXIX is a StrongBuy and SMCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 75.1B vs. HGXIX (259M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: HGXIX (0.94) vs SMCWX (0.61). HGXIX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: HGXIX (8 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. SMCWX (29.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: SMCWX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.21 vs. SMCWX (7.80). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 36.93 vs. SMCWX (14.05).
| HGXIX | SMCWX | HGXIX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.706 | 1.261 | 294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 75.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.61 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.21 | 7.80 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.80 | -4.62 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.93 | 14.05 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.47 | - |