Ad is loading...
HHCCX vs NLSAX
HHCCX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHCCX vs. NLSAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHCCX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. HHCCX (91.4M). HHCCX (0.00) and NLSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . HHCCX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: HHCCX (17 years) vs NLSAX (13 years). HHCCX (4.07) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). HHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 607.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHCCX: NLSAX (1000) vs HHCCX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. HHCCX (1.72). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.24 vs. HHCCX (1.85).
| HHCCX | NLSAX | HHCCX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.38 | 1.68 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.07 | 1.68 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.212 | 2.004 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4M | 7.33B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.72 | 6.63 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.51 | 15.43 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.85 | 30.24 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.77 | 41.94 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...