Ad is loading...
HHHRX vs RNWBX
HHHRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHRX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R3
Price$17.97
Change+$0.44 (+2.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
American Funds New World R2
Price$79.46
Change+$1.71 (+2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
HHHRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHRX vs. RNWBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHRX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. HHHRX (5.44B). HHHRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHRX (0.70) vs RNWBX (0.14). HHHRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHRX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HHHRX (1.68) and RNWBX (1.67) have similar cost to investors . HHHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). HHHRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: HHHRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). HHHRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. RNWBX (2.17). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. HHHRX (33.91).
| HHHRX | RNWBX | HHHRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.921 | 5.710 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.44B | 63.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.14 | 495% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 2.17 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.21 | 21.63 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.91 | 35.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers