Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHRX vs RNWBX
HHHRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHRX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R3
Price$17.97
Change+$0.19 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds New World R2
Price$80.94
Change+$0.59 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.97B
HHHRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHRX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67B vs. HHHRX (5.53B). HHHRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHRX (0.67) vs RNWBX (0.13). HHHRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHRX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). HHHRX (1.68) and RNWBX (1.67) have similar cost to investors . HHHRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). HHHRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: HHHRX (0) vs RNWBX (250). HHHRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. RNWBX (6.23). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.70 vs. HHHRX (22.65).
| HHHRX | RNWBX | HHHRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.67 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.67 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.432 | 9.245 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.53B | 67B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.13 | 499% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 6.23 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.22 | 19.90 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 24.70 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers