Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHSX vs RNWHX
HHHSX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HHHSX vs RNWHX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$19.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$87.87
Change-$0.48 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
HHHSX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHSX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHSX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. HHHSX (5.55B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than HHHSX: RNWHX (0.99) vs HHHSX (0.80). HHHSX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HHHSX (9 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HHHSX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: HHHSX (0) vs RNWHX (250). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. HHHSX (8.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 27.96 vs. HHHSX (22.37).
| HHHSX | RNWHX | HHHSX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.868 | 15.588 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.55B | 70B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.99 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 9.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.41 | 41.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.37 | 27.96 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers