Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIMDX vs NAESX
HIMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HIMDX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Instl
Price$23.15
Change-$0.71 (-2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.45
Change-$1.05 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
HIMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. HIMDX (1.34B). NAESX pays higher dividends than HIMDX: NAESX (1.28) vs HIMDX (0.43). HIMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HIMDX (17 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HIMDX (0.95) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HIMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMDX: NAESX (3000) vs HIMDX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. HIMDX (-5.60). HIMDX return over 5 years is better than : 94.96 vs. NAESX (67.13).
| HIMDX | NAESX | HIMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.17 | 559% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.252 | 3.068 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 3000 | 8,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 153B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.28 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.60 | 9.87 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 33.36 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.96 | 67.13 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.37 | 117.48 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement