Ad is loading...
HIMDX vs NAESX
HIMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HIMDX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Instl
Price$19.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$99.26
Change+$0.85 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
HIMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. HIMDX (1.2B). NAESX pays higher dividends than HIMDX: NAESX (1.39) vs HIMDX (0.47). HIMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HIMDX (17 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HIMDX (0.97) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HIMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMDX: NAESX (3000) vs HIMDX (250000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. HIMDX (-14.01). HIMDX return over 5 years is better than : 123.40 vs. NAESX (66.71).
| HIMDX | NAESX | HIMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.17 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.17 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.807 | -14.464 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 3000 | 8,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.39 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.01 | -2.42 | 579% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.98 | 0.49 | -1,845% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.40 | 66.71 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.25 | 73.20 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...