Ad is loading...
HIMZX vs LALDX
HIMZX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts HIMZX vs LALDX
Virtus Newfleet Low Dur Cor Pl Bd A
Price$10.63
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.23M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.2B
HIMZX vs LALDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIMZX vs. LALDX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMZX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.2B vs. HIMZX (461M). LALDX pays higher dividends than HIMZX: LALDX (4.97) vs HIMZX (4.29). HIMZX was incepted earlier than LALDX: HIMZX (26 years) vs LALDX (32 years). HIMZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LALDX (0.58). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. HIMZX (46.00). HIMZX (2%) and LALDX (2%) have equivalent initial investment costs. LALDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMZX: LALDX (1500) vs HIMZX (2500). HIMZX (6.11) and LALDX (5.94) have marching annual gain over last year. LALDX (14.95) and HIMZX (14.79) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HIMZX | LALDX | HIMZX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.58 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.58 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.641 | 1.671 | 98% |
| Front Load | 2% | 2% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1500 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 461M | 42.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 4.97 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 5.94 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.62 | 11.26 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.79 | 14.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.86 | 26.19 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers