Ad is loading...
HIMZX vs LOLDX
HIMZX vs LOLDX Comparison
Open Charts HIMZX vs LOLDX
Virtus Newfleet Low Dur Cor Pl Bd A
Price$10.63
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets461.23M
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income F3
Price$3.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.2B
HIMZX vs LOLDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIMZX vs. LOLDX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIMZX is a Hold and LOLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOLDX has more cash in the bank: 42.2B vs. HIMZX (461M). LOLDX pays higher dividends than HIMZX: LOLDX (5.24) vs HIMZX (4.29). HIMZX was incepted earlier than LOLDX: HIMZX (26 years) vs LOLDX (8 years). HIMZX (0.93) is less costly to investors than LOLDX (0.32). LOLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. HIMZX (46.00). LOLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HIMZX: LOLDX (0) vs HIMZX (2500). LOLDX (6.23) and HIMZX (6.21) have marching annual gain over last year. LOLDX return over 5 years is better than : 16.26 vs. HIMZX (14.68).
| HIMZX | LOLDX | HIMZX / LOLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.32 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.32 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.641 | 1.767 | 93% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 461M | 42.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 5.24 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | 6.23 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.84 | 12.21 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.68 | 16.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...