Ad is loading...
HIPS vs NTSX
HIPS vs NTSX Comparison
Open Charts HIPS vs NTSX
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
Price$11.94
Change+$0.16 (+1.36%)
Volume$12.3K
Net Assets101.45M
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Price$45.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Volume$24.63K
Net Assets1.12B
HIPS vs NTSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIPS vs. NTSX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPS is a Buy and NTSX is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTSX has more net assets: 1.12B vs. HIPS (101M). NTSX has a higher annual dividend yield than HIPS: NTSX (-2.083) vs HIPS (-3.926). HIPS was incepted earlier than NTSX: HIPS (10 years) vs NTSX (7 years). NTSX (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than HIPS (1.60). HIPS has a higher turnover NTSX (5.00) vs NTSX (5.00).
| HIPS | NTSX | HIPS / NTSX | |
| Gain YTD | -3.926 | -2.083 | 189% |
| Net Assets | 101M | 1.12B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.20 | 800% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 5.00 | 860% |
| Yield | 10.85 | 1.23 | 879% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HIPS | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DGIFX | 22.89 | 0.07 | +0.31% |
| Disciplined Growth Investors | |||
| LVAFX | 10.81 | N/A | N/A |
| LSV Global Managed Volatility Investor | |||
| GOFCX | 23.49 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Victory Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth C | |||
| FGDKX | 58.40 | -0.11 | -0.19% |
| Fidelity Growth Discovery K | |||
| REUYX | 42.68 | -0.09 | -0.21% |
| Russell Sustnbl Aware Eq Y | |||
HIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPS has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIPS jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPS | 100% | +1.32% | ||
| FSK - HIPS | 77% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| PFLT - HIPS | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BXSL - HIPS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| GSBD - HIPS | 71% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| EFC - HIPS | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NTSX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTSX has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTSX jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTSX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTSX | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| AAPL - NTSX | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - NTSX | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| MSFT - NTSX | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| META - NTSX | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| NVDA - NTSX | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.61% |