HL
Price
$5.77
Change
+$0.14 (+2.49%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
57 days until earnings call
MAG
Price
$19.94
Change
+$0.18 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HL vs MAG

Header iconHL vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts HL vs MAGBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.77
Change+$0.14 (+2.49%)
Volume$19.66M
Capitalization3.01B
MAG Silver
Price$19.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.91%)
Volume$1.54M
Capitalization1.12B
HL vs MAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. MAG commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a StrongBuy and MAG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.77 vs. MAG: $19.94)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. MAG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 91% vs. MAG: 95%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. MAG: $1.12B
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than MAG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.54% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than MAG($1.12B). HL has higher P/E ratio than MAG: HL (1111.11) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 50.048 vs. HL (17.684). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. MAG (-13.89M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than HL: MAG (154K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than MAG: HL (720M) vs MAG (0).
HLMAGHL / MAG
Capitalization3.01B1.12B269%
EBITDA124M-13.89M-892%
Gain YTD17.68450.04835%
P/E Ratio1111.1122.984,835%
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M68.7M154%
Total Debt663M154K430,519%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
HL
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1330
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5957
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HL's Valuation (42) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (75). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (59). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (61). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFSTX46.850.69
+1.49%
DFA US Small Cap I
CVAIX22.810.11
+0.48%
Calamos Select Fund I
SMAYX34.31N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap Growth Y (SIMT)
FIQHX43.04N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Europe Z
RIVLX19.19-0.13
-0.67%
American Funds International Vntg R-5