HL
Price
$5.62
Change
+$0.14 (+2.55%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
34 days until earnings call
MTA
Price
$2.81
Change
-$0.05 (-1.75%)
Updated
Apr 3, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
284.03M
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs MTA

Header iconHL vs MTA Comparison
Open Charts HL vs MTABanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.62
Change+$0.14 (+2.55%)
Volume$20.49M
Capitalization3.01B
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.81
Change-$0.05 (-1.75%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization284.03M
HL vs MTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. MTA commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and MTA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.62 vs. MTA: $2.86)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. MTA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 99% vs. MTA: 70%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. MTA: $284.03M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. MTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than MTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than MTA.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while MTA (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.03% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than MTA($284M). HL (14.539) and MTA (13.944) have similar YTD gains . HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. MTA (-917K). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. MTA (14.1M). MTA has less debt than HL: MTA (14.6M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than MTA: HL (720M) vs MTA (4.6M).
HLMTAHL / MTA
Capitalization3.01B284M1,059%
EBITDA124M-917K-13,522%
Gain YTD14.53913.944104%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M4.6M15,669%
Total Cash106M14.1M752%
Total Debt663M14.6M4,541%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs MTA: Fundamental Ratings
HL
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
8891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTA's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (64) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (88) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (91) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MTA (53) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTA (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTMUX21.30N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth R6
LAFRX18.70N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
SDVRX23.83N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R
WWICX11.87N/A
N/A
Westwood Income Opportunity C
FSYMX9.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq M