HL
Price
$6.01
Change
+$0.02 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
46 days until earnings call
MUX
Price
$9.39
Change
+$0.08 (+0.86%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
487.48M
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HL vs MUX

Header iconHL vs MUX Comparison
Open Charts HL vs MUXBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$6.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.33%)
Volume$18.79M
Capitalization3.01B
McEwen Mining
Price$9.39
Change+$0.08 (+0.86%)
Volume$1.17M
Capitalization487.48M
HL vs MUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. MUX commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and MUX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $6.01 vs. MUX: $9.39)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. MUX: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 85% vs. MUX: 175%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. MUX: $487.48M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. MUX’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $487.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MUX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than MUX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HL and MUX are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.15% price change this week, while MUX (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

MUX is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than MUX($487M). HL has higher P/E ratio than MUX: HL (1111.11) vs MUX (9.14). HL YTD gains are higher at: 22.579 vs. MUX (20.694). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. MUX (-73.95M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. MUX (24.8M). MUX has less debt than HL: MUX (41.5M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than MUX: HL (720M) vs MUX (166M).
HLMUXHL / MUX
Capitalization3.01B487M617%
EBITDA124M-73.95M-168%
Gain YTD22.57920.694109%
P/E Ratio1111.119.1412,159%
Revenue720M166M434%
Total Cash106M24.8M427%
Total Debt663M41.5M1,598%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs MUX: Fundamental Ratings
HL
MUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8248
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6396
SMR RATING
1..100
8591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HL's Valuation (54) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MUX (84). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to MUX’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUX (96). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUX’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MUX (91). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to MUX’s over the last 12 months.

MUX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (42). This means that MUX’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MUX (96). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to MUX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRXUX15.35-0.18
-1.16%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R4
NDGAX23.07-0.29
-1.24%
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A
MFVSX17.24-0.22
-1.26%
MassMutual Equity Opports R5
CEUEX57.17-0.78
-1.35%
American Funds EUPAC 529-E
FRSIX17.47-0.25
-1.41%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth C

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with FSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then FSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
+0.33%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
N/A
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
MAG - HL
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
PAAS - HL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
EXK - HL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More

MUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUX has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUX jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUX
1D Price
Change %
MUX100%
+0.86%
AG - MUX
73%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
PAAS - MUX
72%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
HL - MUX
72%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
FSM - MUX
72%
Closely correlated
N/A
MAG - MUX
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
More