HL
Price
$5.48
Change
-$0.08 (-1.44%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
35 days until earnings call
PPTA
Price
$10.77
Change
+$0.08 (+0.75%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
283.79M
49 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs PPTA

Header iconHL vs PPTA Comparison
Open Charts HL vs PPTABanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.48
Change-$0.08 (-1.44%)
Volume$108.25K
Capitalization3.01B
Perpetua Resources
Price$10.77
Change+$0.08 (+0.75%)
Volume$22.65K
Capitalization283.79M
HL vs PPTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. PPTA commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a StrongBuy and PPTA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.56 vs. PPTA: $10.69)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. PPTA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 96% vs. PPTA: 107%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. PPTA: $283.79M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. PPTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $283.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePPTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PPTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than PPTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPTA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PPTA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PPTA is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.28% price change this week, while PPTA (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

PPTA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.63% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than PPTA($284M). HL has higher P/E ratio than PPTA: HL (1111.11) vs PPTA (16.08). HL YTD gains are higher at: 13.317 vs. PPTA (0.187). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. PPTA (-14.14M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. PPTA (3.23M). PPTA has less debt than HL: PPTA (27.9K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than PPTA: HL (720M) vs PPTA (0).
HLPPTAHL / PPTA
Capitalization3.01B284M1,059%
EBITDA124M-14.14M-877%
Gain YTD13.3170.1877,105%
P/E Ratio1111.1116.086,911%
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M3.23M3,283%
Total Debt663M27.9K2,376,344%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs PPTA: Fundamental Ratings
HL
PPTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7611
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5757
SMR RATING
1..100
8894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HL's Valuation (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PPTA (71) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to PPTA’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PPTA (57) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to PPTA’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (88) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PPTA (94) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to PPTA’s over the last 12 months.

PPTA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (46) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PPTA’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PPTA (69) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to PPTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLPPTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHMYX24.600.22
+0.90%
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Y
FAIFX25.390.10
+0.40%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F2
TPYYX8.17N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq Y
JFIFX17.80N/A
N/A
JHancock Financial Industries I
COSSX11.91N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Value Inst2

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with FSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then FSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-1.94%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
PAAS - HL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
MAG - HL
80%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
AG - HL
79%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
More

PPTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PPTA has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PPTA jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPTA
1D Price
Change %
PPTA100%
-2.37%
HL - PPTA
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
SA - PPTA
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
PAAS - PPTA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
CDE - PPTA
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
TORXF - PPTA
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
More