HL
Price
$5.83
Change
-$0.17 (-2.83%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
33 days until earnings call
RSNVF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
20.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HL vs RSNVF

Header iconHL vs RSNVF Comparison
Open Charts HL vs RSNVFBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.83
Change-$0.17 (-2.83%)
Volume$145.12K
Capitalization3.01B
Reyna Silver
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$457.64K
Capitalization20.95M
HL vs RSNVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. RSNVF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and RSNVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.84 vs. RSNVF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. RSNVF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 100% vs. RSNVF: 211%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. RSNVF: $20.95M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. RSNVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSNVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSNVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than RSNVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSNVF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RSNVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSNVF is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while RSNVF (@Precious Metals) price change was +39.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

RSNVF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.03% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than RSNVF($21M). RSNVF YTD gains are higher at: 32.754 vs. HL (19.112). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. RSNVF (-8.27M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. RSNVF (7.88M). HL has higher revenues than RSNVF: HL (720M) vs RSNVF (0).
HLRSNVFHL / RSNVF
Capitalization3.01B21M14,319%
EBITDA124M-8.27M-1,499%
Gain YTD19.11232.75458%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M7.88M1,345%
Total Debt663MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL: Fundamental Ratings
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLRSNVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFIAX568.33N/A
N/A
Vanguard 500 Index Admiral
LAMFX23.92N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
ASICX25.31N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV Asia Pacific Equity C
CFIAX14.14N/A
N/A
Columbia Flexible Capital Income A
APWEX16.52N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill World Energy Investor

RSNVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSNVF has been loosely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RSNVF jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNVF
1D Price
Change %
RSNVF100%
-0.97%
AG - RSNVF
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
PAAS - RSNVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.84%
WPM - RSNVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
HL - RSNVF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
BTG - RSNVF
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.29%
More