HL
Price
$5.05
Change
+$0.01 (+0.20%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
51 days until earnings call
SAND
Price
$5.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs SAND

Header iconHL vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts HL vs SANDBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.20%)
Volume$48.49K
CapitalizationN/A
Sandstorm Gold
Price$5.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.19K
CapitalizationN/A
HL vs SAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. SAND commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and SAND is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (HL: $5.04 vs. SAND: $5.39)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. SAND: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 163% vs. SAND: 174%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. SAND: $1.56B
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than SAND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than SAND.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.67% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

SAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.46% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than SAND($1.56B). HL has higher P/E ratio than SAND: HL (1111.11) vs SAND (37.43). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 7.157 vs. HL (5.545). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. HL (124M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. SAND (14.8M). SAND has less debt than HL: SAND (435M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than SAND: HL (720M) vs SAND (180M).
HLSANDHL / SAND
Capitalization3.01B1.56B193%
EBITDA124M162M77%
Gain YTD5.5457.15777%
P/E Ratio1111.1137.432,969%
Revenue720M180M400%
Total Cash106M14.8M716%
Total Debt663M435M152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
HL
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
9087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAND's Valuation (17) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's SMR Rating (87) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HL (90) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HL (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAND (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGIJX11.820.17
+1.46%
Goldman Sachs Global Infras R6
JGRQX17.830.20
+1.13%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R3
NRIIX21.130.17
+0.81%
Nuveen Real Asset Income I
RIDFX24.360.19
+0.79%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R5
TRACX16.910.08
+0.48%
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val C

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with AGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then AGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
+0.56%
AGI - SAND
77%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
AEM - SAND
77%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
MAG - SAND
77%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
PAAS - SAND
76%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
HL - SAND
75%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More