HL
Price
$5.43
Change
+$0.28 (+5.44%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
57 days until earnings call
SAND
Price
$6.21
Change
+$0.11 (+1.80%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.56B
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs SAND

Header iconHL vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts HL vs SANDBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.43
Change+$0.28 (+5.44%)
Volume$130.48K
Capitalization3.01B
Sandstorm Gold
Price$6.21
Change+$0.11 (+1.80%)
Volume$76.43K
Capitalization1.56B
HL vs SAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. SAND commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Buy and SAND is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.15 vs. SAND: $6.11)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. SAND: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 137% vs. SAND: 63%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. SAND: $1.56B
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the long-term than HL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

SAND is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than SAND($1.56B). HL has higher P/E ratio than SAND: HL (1111.11) vs SAND (37.43). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 9.498 vs. HL (4.961). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. HL (124M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. SAND (14.8M). SAND has less debt than HL: SAND (435M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than SAND: HL (720M) vs SAND (180M).
HLSANDHL / SAND
Capitalization3.01B1.56B193%
EBITDA124M162M77%
Gain YTD4.9619.49852%
P/E Ratio1111.1137.432,969%
Revenue720M180M400%
Total Cash106M14.8M716%
Total Debt663M435M152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
HL
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7673
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
8483
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9693
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5043

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAND's Valuation (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HL (21) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAND (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's SMR Rating (83) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HL (84) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Price Growth Rating (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HL (96) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HL (52) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew somewhat faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGIIX38.45N/A
N/A
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class I
RGNCX25.30N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition C
GABTX22.76N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Content & Connect AAA
JRANX80.33N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Research N
FMQRX15.11N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Quest R6