HL
Price
$6.69
Change
-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
18 days until earnings call
SLSR
Price
$2.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs SLSR

Header iconHL vs SLSR Comparison
Open Charts HL vs SLSRBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$6.69
Change-$0.09 (-1.33%)
Volume$9.33M
CapitalizationN/A
Solaris Resources
Price$2.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.26K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HL vs SLSR Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HL vs. SLSR commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Sell and SLSR is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HL: $6.69 vs. SLSR: $2.32)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. SLSR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 92% vs. SLSR: 74%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. SLSR: $0
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. SLSR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLSR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLSR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than SLSR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLSR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLSR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HL and SLSR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while SLSR (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

SLSR is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL YTD gains are higher at: 39.756 vs. SLSR (-24.098).
HLSLSRHL / SLSR
Capitalization3.01BN/A-
EBITDA124MN/A-
Gain YTD39.756-24.098-165%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720MN/A-
Total Cash106MN/A-
Total Debt663MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs SLSR: Fundamental Ratings
HL
SLSR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
689
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
9099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLSR's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLSR’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLSR (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLSR (99) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLSR (64) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLSR (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than SLSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLSLSR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SLSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SLSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLSR has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLSR jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLSR
1D Price
Change %
SLSR100%
-0.22%
HL - SLSR
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
MAG - SLSR
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
CDE - SLSR
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
AG - SLSR
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
SAND - SLSR
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More