HL
Price
$5.78
Change
+$0.15 (+2.66%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
58 days until earnings call
SLVTF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
57.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HL vs SLVTF

Header iconHL vs SLVTF Comparison
Open Charts HL vs SLVTFBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.78
Change+$0.15 (+2.66%)
Volume$191.01K
Capitalization3.01B
Silver Tiger Metals
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$494.87K
Capitalization57.79M
HL vs SLVTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. SLVTF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a StrongBuy and SLVTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.63 vs. SLVTF: $0.27)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. SLVTF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 133% vs. SLVTF: 149%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. SLVTF: $57.79M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. SLVTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVTF is a better buy in the long-term than HL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVTF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLVTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVTF is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.39% price change this week, while SLVTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.90% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than SLVTF($57.8M). SLVTF YTD gains are higher at: 67.506 vs. HL (14.829). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. SLVTF (-4.4M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. SLVTF (18.4M). SLVTF has less debt than HL: SLVTF (33.5K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than SLVTF: HL (720M) vs SLVTF (0).
HLSLVTFHL / SLVTF
Capitalization3.01B57.8M5,202%
EBITDA124M-4.4M-2,816%
Gain YTD14.82967.50622%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M18.4M576%
Total Debt663M33.5K1,979,104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs SLVTF: Fundamental Ratings
HL
SLVTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1319
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5966
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLVTF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (42) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVTF (66) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVTF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (61) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLSLVTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THGCX25.290.14
+0.56%
Thornburg International Equity C
LICQX16.81N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Equity R2
IFAFX26.00N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F1
IGMSX8.26N/A
N/A
Voya Global Insights Portfolio S
NDGAX22.72N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A

SLVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVTF has been loosely correlated with GLGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVTF jumps, then GLGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVTF
1D Price
Change %
SLVTF100%
+0.35%
GLGDF - SLVTF
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
MAG - SLVTF
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.33%
AYASF - SLVTF
42%
Loosely correlated
+7.30%
HL - SLVTF
41%
Loosely correlated
+9.53%
WPM - SLVTF
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.86%
More