HL
Price
$5.91
Change
+$0.08 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
35 days until earnings call
SLVTF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
57.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HL vs SLVTF

Header iconHL vs SLVTF Comparison
Open Charts HL vs SLVTFBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.91
Change+$0.08 (+1.37%)
Volume$2.93K
Capitalization3.01B
Silver Tiger Metals
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$323.69K
Capitalization57.79M
HL vs SLVTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. SLVTF commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Buy and SLVTF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.83 vs. SLVTF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. SLVTF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 92% vs. SLVTF: 96%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. SLVTF: $57.79M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. SLVTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $57.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HL and SLVTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVTF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLVTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVTF is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.85% price change this week, while SLVTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than SLVTF($57.8M). SLVTF YTD gains are higher at: 101.700 vs. HL (18.908). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. SLVTF (-4.4M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. SLVTF (18.4M). SLVTF has less debt than HL: SLVTF (33.5K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than SLVTF: HL (720M) vs SLVTF (0).
HLSLVTFHL / SLVTF
Capitalization3.01B57.8M5,202%
EBITDA124M-4.4M-2,816%
Gain YTD18.908101.70019%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M18.4M576%
Total Debt663M33.5K1,979,104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs SLVTF: Fundamental Ratings
HL
SLVTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6465
SMR RATING
1..100
8691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLVTF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (47) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVTF (65) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (86) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVTF (91) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (45) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVTF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLSLVTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCSCX19.70N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value C
LRMAX24.15N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F3
ASMOX19.62N/A
N/A
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style I
BRWUX26.03N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R4
NULV41.27-0.25
-0.60%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with FSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then FSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
+0.52%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
MAG - HL
78%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
PAAS - HL
77%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
EXK - HL
76%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
More

SLVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVTF has been loosely correlated with GLGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVTF jumps, then GLGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVTF
1D Price
Change %
SLVTF100%
+3.36%
GLGDF - SLVTF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
MAG - SLVTF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
AYASF - SLVTF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
HL - SLVTF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
WPM - SLVTF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More