HL
Price
$6.07
Change
+$0.04 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
26 days until earnings call
SSVRF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
35.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HL vs SSVRF

Header iconHL vs SSVRF Comparison
Open Charts HL vs SSVRFBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$6.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.66%)
Volume$9.15M
Capitalization3.01B
Summa Silver
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$126.25K
Capitalization35.14M
HL vs SSVRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. SSVRF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a StrongBuy and SSVRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $6.07 vs. SSVRF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. SSVRF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 43% vs. SSVRF: 80%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. SSVRF: $35.14M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. SSVRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $35.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSVRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SSVRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSVRF is a better buy in the long-term than HL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSVRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSVRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HL and SSVRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while SSVRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SSVRF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than SSVRF($35.1M). SSVRF YTD gains are higher at: 41.484 vs. HL (23.803). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. SSVRF (-3.1M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. SSVRF (11.8M). SSVRF has less debt than HL: SSVRF (15K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than SSVRF: HL (720M) vs SSVRF (0).
HLSSVRFHL / SSVRF
Capitalization3.01B35.1M8,567%
EBITDA124M-3.1M-4,001%
Gain YTD23.80341.48457%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M11.8M898%
Total Debt663M15K4,420,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL: Fundamental Ratings
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLSSVRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSVRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QRON0.05N/A
N/A
Qrons Inc.
RYLPF24.37N/A
N/A
Koninklijke Philips N.V
AMBK14.85N/A
N/A
American Bank, Inc.
BRLAF5.19N/A
N/A
British Land Company (The) PLC
CSGQF1.38N/A
N/A
Costain Group Plc

SSVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSVRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSVRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSVRF
1D Price
Change %
SSVRF100%
+0.22%
PAAS - SSVRF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AG - SSVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
HL - SSVRF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
ASM - SSVRF
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.86%
WPM - SSVRF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
More