HL
Price
$5.38
Change
+$0.03 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
24 days until earnings call
VAUCF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.08M
Ad is loading...

HL vs VAUCF

Header iconHL vs VAUCF Comparison
Open Charts HL vs VAUCFBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.56%)
Volume$15.53M
Capitalization3.01B
Viva Gold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$45.02K
Capitalization12.08M
HL vs VAUCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VAUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. VAUCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and VAUCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.38 vs. VAUCF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. VAUCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 129% vs. VAUCF: 48%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. VAUCF: $12.08M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. VAUCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVAUCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VAUCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than VAUCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VAUCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VAUCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than VAUCF.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while VAUCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than VAUCF($12.1M). HL YTD gains are higher at: 9.572 vs. VAUCF (-0.100). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. VAUCF (-4.77M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. VAUCF (1.85M). VAUCF has less debt than HL: VAUCF (0) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than VAUCF: HL (720M) vs VAUCF (0).
HLVAUCFHL / VAUCF
Capitalization3.01B12.1M24,851%
EBITDA124M-4.77M-2,597%
Gain YTD9.572-0.100-9,544%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M1.85M5,720%
Total Debt663M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs VAUCF: Fundamental Ratings
HL
VAUCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
9099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VAUCF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that VAUCF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VAUCF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as VAUCF (99) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as VAUCF (59) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for VAUCF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than VAUCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLVAUCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VAUCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNRVX24.700.22
+0.90%
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Svc
BEXUX15.080.12
+0.80%
Baron Emerging Markets R6
RSSRX27.240.14
+0.52%
Victory RS Select Growth R6
CIMEX24.710.11
+0.45%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
RRRCX22.06-0.04
-0.18%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities C

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
+0.56%
PAAS - HL
85%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
MAG - HL
82%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
AG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
+5.04%
More

VAUCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VAUCF and CRDOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VAUCF and CRDOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VAUCF
1D Price
Change %
VAUCF100%
-5.95%
CRDOF - VAUCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AG - VAUCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
HL - VAUCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
MTA - VAUCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
ASM - VAUCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
More