HLAL vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLAL is a Buy and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HLAL | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 21 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RECRX | 12.40 | 0.08 | +0.65% |
| RBC Emerging Markets Ex-China Equity R6 | |||
| UIIFX | 29.10 | 0.18 | +0.62% |
| Victory International Institutional | |||
| EQTKX | 15.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Shelton Equity Income Class K | |||
| AUUAX | 21.54 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| AB Select US Equity A | |||
| WCMIX | 24.73 | -0.07 | -0.28% |
| WCM Focused International Growth Instl | |||
HLAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAL has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLAL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLAL | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| MSFT - HLAL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| CDNS - HLAL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| SNPS - HLAL | 69% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| INTU - HLAL | 69% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| AAPL - HLAL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 89% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 84% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.07% | ||
| S - SNPS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||