HLAL vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLAL is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HLAL | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 20 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 73% |
HLAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAL has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLAL jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLAL | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| MSFT - HLAL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CDNS - HLAL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SNPS - HLAL | 69% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| INTU - HLAL | 69% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| AAPL - HLAL | 68% Closely correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
More | ||||