HLNE
Price
$113.44
Change
+$1.96 (+1.76%)
Updated
Apr 23, 1:29 PM EST
30 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.66
Change
+$0.21 (+1.14%)
Updated
Apr 23, 1:39 PM EST
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HLNE vs OWL ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconHLNE vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts HLNE vs OWLBanner chart's image
Hamilton Lane
Price$113.44
Change+$1.96 (+1.76%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.66
Change+$0.21 (+1.14%)
Volume$1.58K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HLNE vs OWL Comparison Chart

Loading...

HLNEDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
OWLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
HLNE vs. OWL commentary
Apr 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLNE is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 23, 2024
Stock price -- (HLNE: $111.48 vs. OWL: $18.45)
Brand notoriety: HLNE and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLNE: 73% vs. OWL: 70%
Market capitalization -- HLNE: $4.5B vs. OWL: $8.65B
HLNE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.5B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLNE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLNE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLNE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLNE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

HLNE (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.25% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for HLNE with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for OWL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($4.5B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than HLNE: OWL (185.70) vs HLNE (34.22). OWL YTD gains are higher at: 24.807 vs. HLNE (-1.320). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 633M vs. HLNE (271M). HLNE has more cash in the bank: 164M vs. OWL (104M). HLNE has less debt than OWL: HLNE (277M) vs OWL (2B). OWL has higher revenues than HLNE: OWL (1.73B) vs HLNE (490M).
HLNEOWLHLNE / OWL
Capitalization4.5B8.65B52%
EBITDA271M633M43%
Gain YTD-1.32024.807-5%
P/E Ratio34.22185.7018%
Revenue490M1.73B28%
Total Cash164M104M158%
Total Debt277M2B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLNEOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLNEDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
OWLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TQQQ50.921.44
+2.91%
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
EUDG31.390.37
+1.18%
WisdomTree Europe Quality Div Gr ETF
HAWX30.910.33
+1.08%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
PSCM74.060.10
+0.14%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
SILJ10.77-0.44
-3.93%
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been loosely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
+1.27%
STEP - HLNE
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
CNS - HLNE
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
ARES - HLNE
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
OWL - HLNE
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
BEN - HLNE
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been loosely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+1.04%
TPG - OWL
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
ARES - OWL
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
CG - OWL
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
KKR - OWL
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.00%
HLNE - OWL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More