Advertisement
HMC vs ISVL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMC is a Buy and ISVL is a Hold.
HMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HMC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while .
- HMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- HMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HMC (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -0.12% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +114.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
HMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+114.13% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| APCB | 28.19 | -0.14 | -0.49% |
| ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) | |||
| NBFR | 26.92 | -0.14 | -0.51% |
| Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF (NBFR) | |||
| OALC | 41.25 | -0.24 | -0.58% |
| OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) | |||
| IVE | 230.46 | -1.58 | -0.68% |
| iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) | |||
| WLTG | 37.94 | -0.44 | -1.15% |
| WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) | |||
HMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMC has been closely correlated with TM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMC jumps, then TM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMC | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| TM - HMC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| GM - HMC | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| F - HMC | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| RACE - HMC | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| RIVN - HMC | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.40% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISVL has been loosely correlated with IAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISVL jumps, then IAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| IAG - ISVL | 54% Loosely correlated | -5.18% | ||
| HMC - ISVL | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| BAP - ISVL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ALSN - ISVL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| IDR - ISVL | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.36% | ||
More | ||||