Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMCNX vs VIMSX
HMCNX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HMCNX vs VIMSX
Harbor Mid Cap Investor
Price$15.09
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.32M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.00
Change-$0.19 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
HMCNX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMCNX vs. VIMSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMCNX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. HMCNX (170M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HMCNX: VIMSX (1.37) vs HMCNX (0.00). HMCNX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HMCNX (6 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HMCNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HMCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HMCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HMCNX (2500) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.59 vs. HMCNX (4.62). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.56 vs. HMCNX (44.56).
| HMCNX | VIMSX | HMCNX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.17 | 724% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.904 | 8.555 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 197B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | 14.59 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.07 | 26.70 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.56 | 62.56 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement